Sermon
of October 9, 2005
Presented by Rev. Chuck Ericson
Scripture lesson: 1 Corinthians 13
“We Just Don't Know"
I
mentioned last week that some thoughts for my sermons this month come from a
trip that Jane and I took to
We got
talking to the ranger while we were there, asking about how this canyon got
formed and whether people believed that once there was ocean there. The ranger
said, “We don’t know.” And we said, “Oh, well maybe there was ocean and
it eroded away and left this rincon or box canyon.” And she said, “We
don’t know.” “Well maybe there was a glacier here. Do you think there was
a glacier here?” and she said, “We
just don’t know.” And at
that moment I had just a very startling awareness of how close in some ways
science and geology and exploration are to religion and Christianity – because
the same answer applies very often to questions people ask about the Bible,
about faith, about Christianity. The answer that I give probably more often than
I would like is, “We just don’t know.” There is not absolute truth,
perfect facts that build the foundation of our faith. There are really three
different categories of responses when people ask questions about faith. So I
want to take a few moments to look at those different categories of answers, and
one of them is going to be, “We just don’t know,” but I’m saving that
for the end.
But
the first answer we can give sometimes is, “We are pretty certain that
something is not true or not factual” or
perhaps even close to being considered fictional, although that’s a difficult
word for some people when we talk about matters of faith. But there are some
things that we’re pretty certain are not true or factual, just as it is true
for exploration or science, we’ve learned over the years that the sun does not
revolve around the Earth. People thought that for a while. And then we learned
that wasn’t true. We learned that the Earth is not flat, it’s round, so that
was dispelled after many hundreds of years of believing, and we learned that
And the
same is true in religion. In the Bible, if you had an old King James Version,
the first five books of the Bible were often called the first five books of
Moses. The belief that people had for many years was that Moses wrote those
first five books of the Bible, because Moses is associated with the Ten
Commandments and the laws which are at the center of these five books. But if
you get right to the end of Deuteronomy, it says, in Deuteronomy 34, so “Moses
the servant of the Lord died there in the land of Moab according to the word of
the Lord and he was buried in the valley in the land of Moab opposite Bethpeor,
but no [one] knows the place of his burial to this day” (Deuteronomy 34:5-6). Moses
couldn’t write about his death and his burial, could he? No. So Moses didn’t
write all of the first five books of the Bible. In fact it says here he was 120
years old when he died and there were more than 120 years between creation and
this point where Moses dies at the end of Deuteronomy when Joshua takes over. So
some people felt at one point that it was all Moses’ handiwork and we know now
that it wasn’t. Some of it was, to be sure, the work of somebody like Moses or
somebody with the name Moses, but it wasn’t all. So
that has been dispelled over the years.
Another
one is that David wrote all the Psalms. There are 150 Psalms and David is
believed to have been a creative writer and had written some of them, but not
all of them. I like to think David wrote the 23rd Psalm. There’s
nothing that I know of that would dispel that but if you get to Psalm 137,
it’s the words actually that form the basis of the song, “By the Willows”
in Godspell, and it begins, “By the waters of
There are
numerous other things that we’ve learned over the years that we thought once
were true that are not. The Bible, for example, isn’t a chronological
document. It isn’t written by time as much as by theme. Themes are put
together. So if somebody wants to read the Bible from cover to cover, from
Genesis 1 to Revelation 22, you can do that but it’s probably not the best
idea because you read through first and second Kings, for example, and you get
to first and second Chronicles and some of the same stuff is repeating and other
things that already happened are happening again because they have some of the
same material. So it can be confusing to do that but it also shows that the
Bible wasn’t written chronologically. It was written according to themes.
A couple
other things are that the parables of Jesus are not necessarily true stories but
stories Jesus used to illustrate something, so they’re not meant to be factual
but illustrative. And also the Christmas story. Christmas is coming up, and
there are elements to the Christmas story that some people think are true, I
think, but they’re not. For example, in the Christmas story there was no
innkeeper. Did you know that? There was no innkeeper. It says Mary and Joseph
got to Bethlehem and there was no room for them at the inn and that’s it. Plays and pageants
and things from there have developed the innkeeper as a key figure, but we
don’t know if there was somebody like that or if they got there and saw
everything looked like it was full and they wouldn’t get in there and just
walked away without even asking. There aren’t necessarily three kings. There
probably aren’t any kings, but the wise ones, the Magi, there’s no number in
the Bible, it just says they brought gold and frankincense and myrrh, three
items, so people thought, “Well, there were three of them.” And on and on.
There are things that some people have thought to be true over the years that
we’ve discovered are not true. So just like science and exploration, religion
has that same element: we think things for a certain time and then realize later
on that maybe they’re not as true or as factual as we thought they were.
On
the other hand there are things that are pretty clear, as close as you can get
to saying are certainly true, certainly factual. It’s true in science when we kept pushing the ranger about whether the
ocean or the glacier was causing this box canyon and finally gave up, she went
into her speech about how it’s really like a layer cake. She loved this image
of a layer cake and I was out there with my bottle of water but I was getting
hungry hearing about the layer cake, about how this layer of rock came in and
then another layer on top of it, and she said, “We know that that’s true. We
know that it’s true that the canyon was built like a layer cake.” We
couldn’t get her off the layer cake into anything else other than, “We just
don’t know all the rest but we know that it’s like a layer cake.”
There are
certain things about the Bible and our faith that we know pretty much for
certain too – for example, that the Old Testament or the Hebrew scriptures
were written in Hebrew or Aramaic, spoken in Aramaic and written in Hebrew. We
have found in the Dead Sea Scrolls some old manuscripts that have it in Hebrew.
We know that the New Testament, or Christian scriptures, were written in Greek.
We know that Jesus and John the Baptist really lived. There are people who are
opposed to Christianity I suppose who like to say that our faith is all a lot of
fairy tale, and yet there was a historian, a Jewish historian at the same time
Jesus and John the Baptist lived named Josephus who wrote about Jesus as some
man who did wonderful things, and about another man who lived out in the
wilderness and dressed strangely and ate weird things named John, who was John
the Baptist, who wore animals’ clothes and ate locusts and wild honey. That
doesn’t sound very good, does it? I like the layer cake but not the locusts
and the wild honey. Or the locust part anyway. So Josephus, who was Jewish, and
might not have automatically been an advocate for Christianity since many
perceived Christianity was taking people away from Judaism, this Jewish writer
confirmed there was a Jesus and there was a John the Baptist at that time. We
know also from other historical documents that
I like to
think that the Bible is like a layer cake, too. That first there were the books
that are associated with Moses that give the foundation for how things started
and then the works of the Prophets built upon that, and there’s some nice
creamy frosting in there, and then there’s the gospels, another layer of
creamy frosting, and the letters of Paul, and the Revelation at the end. In the
same way it’s built upon one layer upon another just like geology teaches us
about box canyons. So we know certain things are pretty much true.
And
then there is that category, even in faith, that you just throw up your hands
and say, “We just don’t know” and
you keep asking me or somebody else the same question over and over again and
I’m going to say, “We just don’t know.” Creation is an example.
There’s kind of a heated debate developing now around Intelligent Design,
Creationism and Darwinism, and I think the real answer of faith is, we just
don’t know. I was taught in seminary that the stories of Genesis, about the
six days of creation and Adam and Eve were meant to be not about scientific
explanations for the origins of the world but about the unfolding of God’s
dream. That this was God’s beginning of a world where people would live and
there would be beauty and people would build the creation toward something good.
And it’s about the idea that God created for a purpose, not how God created in
stages scientifically. And I kind of like that. I don’t think that religion
needs to be in a debate with science about something. In fact when it does get
that way I kind of like the quote that was in the program this morning, up at
the top, from Abraham J. Heschel, whose daughter, Hannah Susanna Heschel was in
my class at
We just
don’t know about some other things too. We don’t know, for example, who
wrote all those books by John in the New Testament. There’s the gospel of
John, there’s the first, second and third letters of John and the Revelation
of John and some Biblical scholars say, “Well they’re all so very different
they couldn’t possibly be the same person,” and yet I had a professor in
seminary who said, “Well, they are very different. Revelation is written very
differently from the gospel and the gospel and Revelation are very different
from the letters.” But the professor said, “You know, I write a letter to my
wife, when I’m away from home, one way, I write a sermon a different way, I
write a dissertation to my university another way.” Same person writing, three
different styles that don’t seem alike at all. Maybe it was. We just don’t
know. We just don’t know.
In the Ten
Commandments it says one place, “Thou shall not kill.” Translators think it
that it also might say rightly, “Thou shall not commit murder.” There’s a
big difference between committing murder and killing. I think that’s something
that helps people who find themselves sometimes having to be in a position of
defending others or defending themselves, such as soldiers, police officers,
others. When someone does die in the process it wasn’t an intentional murder,
it was someone died out of self-defense of others. That may be a comforting
thought to think that what it really means is you don’t commit murder, it’s
not don’t kill anything under any circumstances. The other would be nice but
it may be too much to expect. But the truth is we just don’t know which one it
really is. People think we can’t add to the Bible because in Revelation it
says, at the end of 22 it says, “I warn everyone who hears the words of the
prophecy of this book, if anyone adds to them God will add to him the plagues
described in this book.” So nobody’s ever added to the Bible. Revelation 22
is the last chapter. Other people have written marvelous things over the years.
Martin Luther King, Mother Theresa, Joan of Arc… there have been words spoken,
stories told about marvelous things that some people thought maybe we should
have a new New Testament or something, but they’re afraid to because of that.
I think that means the Book of Revelation, not the whole Bible. Maybe someday
there might be other holy scriptures. I’m watching out for the plagues….
And then
another big issue today that people argue about is same gender relationships,
and what does our faith say about that and truth be told, we just don’t know.
What did Jesus say about it? We just don’t know. There’s nothing in the
Bible where Jesus addresses that issue one way or the other directly. We can
read other things Jesus said, and try and understand what Jesus meant about how
we should love our neighbors and how we should not be judgmental, and we can
read other things that say otherwise. We can try and come to terms with that
issue, but we can’t say for sure Jesus said absolutely this or Jesus said
absolutely that. If we did, we don’t have a record of it. We just don’t
know.
We
struggle with these things in faith just like science struggles understanding
the origins of rock formations and the ocean and the world. And it’s good that
we should but we should also know that with some of it we’re going to continue
to say, “We just don’t know.” And Paul addresses that in the letter to the
Corinthians. He speaks about life and he says that, “And now we know only in
part. Later on we shall know completely. Now we see in a mirror dimly. One day
we shall know fully.” We see things only in part now. We see things like
we’re looking dimly into a mirror. We don’t know everything. Not everything
is proof, not everything is fact, not everything is true even about our faith.
But
the good news today is there’s one solid thing we can depend upon. One truth,
one fact if you will, and that is what Paul writes about love: “Love bears all things, believes all things, hopes all
things and endures all things, and love never ends.” Love is at the center of
what our lives should be about as individuals but also as God’s people. Love
should be at the center of our discussions with one another about the matters
that affect us in our world today. Not about winning our side but about loving
one another. “Love bears all things, believes all things, hopes all things,
endures all things. Love never ends.” That is the truth we can depend upon. We
don’t say, “Should we love one another? We don’t know for sure.” Yes, we
do. We should love one another. That’s what Jesus came to teach us, that’s
what Paul writes about, that’s what these words echo down through the ages
through weddings and funerals and even in church today tell us; that that’s
what’s most important of all. We can talk about those other things. We can try
and strive and understand but what’s most important is that we love one
another.